So Sean Hannity is calling Mesa City Councilman Tom Rawles a liberal. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,247144,00.htmlHow can you call anyone who has been so consistently against government taxation and so consistently for property rights as Rawles a liberal? I guess only if you don’t really understand the distinctions between liberal, conservative, and libertarian or you just don’t care. I think it’s the latter. Hannity’s definition of a liberal is anybody who doesn’t agree with Hannity and President Bush. If Hannity is not about illuminating, then what is he about? You can answer that as well as I. I’m not a fan of Tom Rawles or his decision on the Pledge of Allegiance, but that’s irrelevant. If you are interested in who Tom Rawles is and what drives him, I urge you to read reporter Jason Massad’s profile in Sunday’s Tribune. Here’s a link: http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/index.php?sty=83480Jim

Posted in: Uncategorized |

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.