“DNA links illegal immigrant to attacks”
I got hammered for that headline in our Sunday paper by a fellow named Paul Rubi.
YOUR RACIST HEADLINE ON CHANDLER RAPIST DIVIDE COMMUNITY his email to my boss, publisher Julie Moreno, said.
There was a lot more to the message, but you get the picture.
I replied as best I could that I didn’t see the headline as an attack on American Hispanics, but that I thought the fact that the suspect is a twice deported illegal immigrant is relevant to the story.
He then blasted me in a follow-up, saying essentially that I am obviously white and, therefore, unqualified to talk about what constitutes racism. He distributed his follow-up message to a lot of his friends.
One of the people on his email list sent me another scolding in a slightly milder tone. She said the headline contributed to an evolving “anti-Hispanic frenzy.”
“…the media has taken every opportunity,” she continued, “to increase the hate by overusing the words illegal immigrant until you have convinced the public that all immigrants are probably here without authorization and responsible for anything wrong that occurs in our country.”
Was that just hyperbole or does she really believe this?
Sure, the issue of illegal immigration has brought a lot of bigots out of the closet. But that doesn’t mean all those who want to see our immigration laws enforced are bigots.
Most of us know that and won’t fall for Rubi’s faulty syllogism.
I’m reminded of the wisdom of Eleanor Roosevelt: “No one can make you feel inferior without your consent.”
There must be a corollary to the effect that if you convince yourself that bigotry is all around you, you will see bigotry all around you and become its victim.
I went looking for bigotry in connection with the rapist story on our Web site. Why? Let’s be honest, a fair number of the commenters on immigration stories are zealots or they wouldn’t spend so much time feeling the need to beat the drum for their cause and harangue those who don’t agree with them.
In fact, I was prepared to remind the bigots I expected to find that the alleged serial shooters captured in Mesa 18 months ago are white and the alleged Baseline killer is black.
What I found was heartening. There were a fair number of comments that drew a clear distinction that their feelings about the Chandler rapist suspect had a lot to do with his being in the country illegally—in fact twice deported—and nothing to do with his being Hispanic.
“There are many good people of Hispanic decent in this valley and they have nothing in common with this pig except the country he is from,” a commenter who calls himself “cartmanspeaks”, said. Based on his ardor in past comments, I had pegged cartmanspeaks as a closet bigot, but I’m giving him another chance.
Another commenter, ptrocks, chimed in: “This isn’t about being hispanic or white! you don’t listen nor read the articles do you? our problem is with ‘illegal aliens!! GET IT!… we all know that there are wonderful people of all ethnicities, that’s not what this is about!”
I’m not sure but it may have been libertarian philosopher Tibor Machan who made the observation that true Americans are not defined by the color of their skin, or the place of their birth, but by their beliefs.
If you believe in the Bill of Rights, if you believe in the rule of law, if you accept responsibility for your actions, if you believe the Creator endowed each of us with the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, then you belong.